March Madness

It is amazing the power of the little very low stakes competition at the office can do to people. Each of us has filled out an NCAA Tournament bracket, and all of a sudden everyone is obsessed with college basketball. As a big fan who watches a lot of games, it isn't a big deal to me, but put lunch on the line and all of a sudden some of the ladies in the office who would never watch a game or care are going nuts over games between teams they've never heard of. Which is great, of course. A little fun never hurt anyone. Did I mention that I am winning?

Movie Review: Syriana (*1/2 of 4: Poor to Fair)

Syriana, Stephen Gaghen's political thriller about the oil industry's interests in the Middle East, has one major problem. It is utterly boring. The movie's story is simplistic and without surprises. Various plotlines are introduced slowly over the first hour of the movie. Two oil companies plan to merge, but (of course) there have been payoffs along the way so the US government is investigating. The merging oil company downsizes, causing unemployment and leading young men to become Islamic martyrs. A kindharted crown prince of a middle eastern country wants to transform his country into a liberal, modern state, but the US wants to maintain control over the country's oil and wants him dead. There are more plotlines, but they are not particularly relevant. Everything that happens in these plotlines is perfectly predictable. Syriana is only considered complex or confusing because the various plotlines are revealed slowly in 5-10 minute snippets. So, you get a few minutes of corrupt oilmen planning their merger, then cut to the middle east and a CIA agent, then to the noble prince and so on, going back and forth throughout the movie.

Syriana fails because you know where everything is going. Will the noble crown prince be able to transform his middle eastern nation? Will the corrupt oil companies complete their merger? Well, given that this movie is clearly designed to be a "realistic portrayal" of the interplay between the oil industry and the middle east, you can easily guess. The acting in the movie is good, as George Clooney (CIA agent), Matt Damon (investment analyst), Alexander Siddig (Prince Nasir), and Mazhar Musin as the terrorist Nasim all portray their charaters with conviction. However, the direction and story fails them in the end, as the method of jumping back and forth among numerous plotlines fails to allow any of the characters to develop any complexity. So, when a political thriller is predictible, plodding, and doesn't intorducte any interesting or complex characters what you have, is a bad movie.

SNL Chronicles of Narnia Rap

This is quite humorous. I guess SNL still can turn out some funny material from time to time. (Nod to the website YouTube)

Indy Colts to meet their match

The Onion clearly has a very funny staff writer as part of their sports page. Click here for a hilarious article about the 12-0 Colts being forced to play the Harlem Globetrotters football squad.

The Best Christmas Special

USA Today has a wonderful article on the classic A Charlie Brown Christmas. The article details how many people were skeptical regarding the show's popularity when it was made and has interviews with many of the folks involved with its production. An early Christmas present from the folks at USA Today.

Na Na Na Na, Na Na Na Na, Hey Hey Hey, Goodbye!

No, this isn't my second Hariet Miers post in a row. Rather it is to bid farewell to another baseball season and a begrudging salute to the Chicago White Sox, who traditionally sing the song to opponents when a pitcher is removed or the Sox are victorious. The White Sox had a magical year where everything went well. All their starting pitchers were healthy throughout the season, and other than a fading Frank Thomas, most of the position players were healthy. In addition to being healthy, most everyone on the squad put up numbers that were at or above expectations. Credit goes to GM Kenny Williams who assembled a squad that had all the elements of a good team: a deep, quality starting pitching staff; live arms in the bullpen blending youth and experience; speed at the top of the lineup; plenty of home run power; excellent defense; execution of the fundamentals of the game; and an overall high level of athleticism on the squad. As a Cubs fan I can only hope that perhaps next year is our turn (The Red Sox had the third longest drought and won last year, the White Sox and the second longest and won this year). However, I am not counting on it unless the team gets another starter, middle relief help, and (most importantly) a leadoff hitter and some hitters at the top of the lineup who will consistently get on base for Derrek Lee and Aramis Ramirez. Yep, I'm already waiting 'till next year.

Pragmatic Politicians

The nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court has once again shown that politicians, including this White House, are generally pragmatists when it comes to the means by which they attempt to reach their goals. Ms. Miers is being marketed to Christians as an opponent of Roe v. Wade (I hope that she is) while at the same time others supportive of abortion are told that what she believes or her personal position does not necessarily provide proof on how she would render judgment in an abortion case. This is at odds with the obvious implication to Christians--that Ms. Miers' beliefs are an indicator of how she will decide a case. What does this mean? Well, the obvious--that a person had better listen to all the pronouncements that a politician makes upon a subject in attempting to discern what that person's position is on a matter. A good rule of thumb is that if a person is willing to say something to a group that he knows those listening will disagree with him on, then you have found that person's true position. If the person is unwilling to make the statement in front of certain audiences, then it is not among that person's deepest principles or beliefs.

Additionally, a politician is generally willing to state his core goals in front of any audience. For instance, George W. Bush is willing to state his policies regarding the War on Terror in unambiguous terms at any time. This indicates that this is a primary focus for him personally and his beliefs are deeply held. If President Bush soft pedaled his presentation for certain audiences or circumstances, then it would show that his position is either subject to change, or that certain of his statements on the matter are a means to a different end. The fact that this administration provides contrary arguments regarding the abortion issue with Ms. Miers is a strategic decision to get her confirmed to the court. Which indicates to me that in the Administration's eyes the abortion issue is not the primary reason why Harriet Miers should be on the court. Which is why when I watch her confirmation hearings, I am going to be looking for exactly why the administration wants her on the bench.

Return of the Web Log

After a two month hiatus brought on by a busy time at work, my blog will again be active and hopefully worth reading. I can promise you plenty of posts in the upcoming weeks. Whether that is a promise or a threat probably depends on how you view this blog!

Killearn DTS: Romans 15:14--16:27

In verse 14 of chapter 15, Paul begins winding down his letter to the church at Rome by paying the Christians in Rome the compliment of saying that they are full of goodness, complete in knowledge and competent to instruct one another. Wesley notes that they are full of goodness because of being born again in Christ and are complete in knowledge through long experience in the things of God. Paul states that he wrote boldly to the church at times in his letter because that is what God has called Paul to do—to be a minister of Jesus to the Gentiles and proclaim the gospel to them and thus aid in their becoming acceptable to God and sanctified by the Holy Spirit. (v. 15-16). Calvin notes that in order to instruct someone with boldness and offer correction a person needs to be both kind and to have skill in offering useful advice. The latter is obviously necessary, for advice that consistently does not prosper a person will be quickly discarded. The former is necessary both because only a kind person will look to aid those around them, and kindness when giving the advice or correction will make the hearer more inclined to listen. Because of his calling to the Gentiles and the work God is performing in many of them through Christ and the Spirit, Paul glories in the person of Christ in his service to God. (v. 17). Paul’s focus on the person and works of Christ is so great that he wants only to speak of what Christ has done through Paul in leading the Gentiles to obey God by Paul’s works, often accompanied by signs and miracles, through the power of the Spirit. In obeying his calling, Paul traveled from Jerusalem to Illyricum (near present day Serbia) preaching the Gospel. (v. 18-19). Calvin points out that this passage shows that the purpose of signs and miracles is to serve as a display and testimony to the divine power of God and thus lead us to admire and adore God.

Paul declares that since being converted, his desire has always been to preach the gospel in areas where Christ was not known, so that he would not be building on the foundation of others. (v. 20). This desire is explained with a quote from Isa 52:15, which states that “Those who were not told about him will see, and those who have not heard will not understand.” Thus it appears that Paul is not so much motivated by ambition, but rather to share the gospel with those who have not heard it. It is because of this desire, Paul explains, that he has often been hindered from visiting the church at Rome in person. (v. 22). However, now that he has fully proclaimed the gospel in that region, he plans to visit with the church at Rome on his way to Spain. (v. 23-24). However, Paul must first return to Jerusalem to present a gift from the churches at Macedonia and Achaia for the poor of the city. (v. 25-26). The believers in these gentile cities were happy to do it, as a way of repaying the Jews for the privilege God has given them to share in the spiritual heritage of the Jewish faith. (v. 27). Once this task is done, Paul will come and visit Rome in the full measure of the blessing of Christ. (v. 28-29). As Calvin notes, Paul is confident that his visit to the Romans will yield spiritual blessings to the church there.

Paul asks the Romans to join in his ministry by praying to God for him, that he will be rescued from unbelievers when he journeys back to Jerusalem, and that his service once there will be acceptable to the saints (believers) there. (v. 30-31). As Calvin notes, if Paul was willing to ask for the prayers of others to aid him, we would be stupid not to do the same in our lives. Paul asks for these prayers so that by God’s will he will come to Rome with joy and will join with the church there in being refreshed. (v. 32). Paul concludes his request for prayer with a quick prayer for the church at Rome, that God will be with them. (v. 33).

Paul concludes his letter with personal greetings that he asks will be passed along to individuals and households in Rome. He begins these by asking that the church receive Phoebe, a deaconess from the church in Cenchrea (port city near Corinth). He commends Phoebe to them, saying that she has been a great help to many people, including Paul himself and asks the church to help her if need be. (v. 1-2). Wesley and Calvin both state that it is Phoebe who is delivering this letter to the Romans. Paul asks for many people to be greeted, including a large number of women believers. Of note are Priscilla and Aquilla (husband and wife, see Acts 18:2), fellow tentmakers who risked their lives for Paul, and Andronicus and Junicas who were in prison with Paul. (v. 3-15). Paul states that all the churches of Christ send their greetings to the church at Rome. (v. 16).

Paul warns the Romans to watch out for persons who cause divisions and place obstacles that are contrary to the instruction in the gospel that they have learned. Paul is quite blunt that such persons are to be avoided because they do not serve the Lord Christ, but rather themselves and their appetites. The false teachers use smooth talk and flattery to deceive the minds of the naïve. (v. 17-18). Calvin is correct in noting that a false prophet can be identified by the fact they concern for themselves first and foremost, rather than for Christ and the good of others. Paul warned about false teachers numerous times, including in Galatians 1:8 and 1 Tim 1:3. Paul states that everyone has heard about the obedience to Christ shown by the saints at Rome, and that he is full of joy over their obedience. Nevertheless, he wants them to be wise about what is good and innocent about what is evil. (v. 19). Paul concludes with en exhortation that God will soon crush Stan under their feet and praying that the grace of “our Lord Jesus be with you.” (v. 20) He passes on greetings of others with him, including Timothy. (v. 21-24). Paul ends with a benediction of praise to God. God, who is able to establish the believer through the gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ. God, who has revealed the mystery of his purpose of redeeming mankind through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Who commanded that these events be prophesied for the purpose of bringing all nations to believe and obey God. That this only wise God be glorified forever through Jesus Christ. (v. 25-27).

Further Evidence Of The Need For A New Spacecraft

If the fact that the shuttle continues to have debris rain from it is not enough to convince you of the need for a new spacecraft (one is in development) and to scrap the shuttle ASAP, read how they plan to repair the bottom of the spacecraft:

(By PAM EASTON, Associated Press Writer)

NASA says the protruding material on Discovery's belly could cause dangerous overheating during re-entry and lead to another Columbia-type disaster.

The agency planned to put astronaut Stephen Robinson on the end of the space station's 58-foot robotic arm Wednesday for the improvised maneuver. Astronauts inside the station will maneuver the arm so Robinson can reach the shuttle's belly. Once there, he'll tug out the ceramic-fabric filler with his gloved hands.

If that doesn't work, he'll use a makeshift hacksaw to cut away the material, which is sticking out about an inch from two spots near Discovery's nose. The saw was improvised out of a blade, plastic ties, duct tape, Velcro and other items aboard the space station. "I am pretty comfortable with using tools very carefully," Robinson said early Tuesday during a crew news conference. "But no doubt about it, this is going to be a very delicate task. But as I say, a simple one." The protruding bits of gap filler are small — one is about the thickness of an index card and the other is the size of three index cards bonded together.

"There won't be any yanking going on at all," Robinson said. "It will be a gentle pull with my hand. If that doesn't work, I have some forceps. I will give it a slightly more than gentle pull. If that doesn't work, I saw it off with a hacksaw."

See the whole article here

Killearn DTS Romans 14:14--15:13

Verse 14 of chapter 14 is Paul's statement that he is convinced that as a Christian, no food is unclean in and of itself. However, if a person believes something to be unclean, then for that person it is. This was revealed to Peter in Acts 10, and Jesus had declared all foods clean (contrary to the old Jewish law) in Mark 7: 19-23. Jesus based His teaching on the moral fact that what a man thinks in his heart and his actions are what make him unclean--unable to be acceptable to God--not what a person eats. Paul continues in Romans by saying if a fellow Christian is distressed by the eating of food that person considers unclean, then it should not be eaten because it harms that fellow Christian. By harming others through the exercise of Christian freedom, what should be considered a good thing--freedom in Christ through the abolition of the law--may be considered evil because it ends up harming others. (v. 15-16) As Wesley somewhat humorously put it, we should not value our meat over he for whom Christ died. Paul explains both why Christ abolished the dietary laws of the Old Testament and why Christians should also consider the weaknesses of those around them when acting with regard to such matters in verses 17-18. "For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit, because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and approved by men." Calvin points out that not only do we have freedom in Christ from the external rules of the law, but we also have freedom not to exercise our freedom if doing so would harm others. He additionally notes that Paul states that the kingdom of God consists of righteousness--the nature of which is what is in the heart--and then describes what freedom from the law and a relationship with God and Christ brings. Peace and joy through the Holy Spirit.

--What do you suppose are some of the possible reasons why God declared some foods to be unclean for His chosen people? Paul states that though all foods are clean for the Christian, if a person believes a food unclean, then it is unclean for that person. Why is that the case and what does this show regarding what type of obedience God finds important? Why is it important that our actions not be regarded as evil? What are some of the ways this teaching about the cleanliness of food could be abused? How would you counter an improper use of this teaching?

We are to make every effort to do what leads to peace among Christians and mutual edification, not destroying the good that God is doing in the church community for the sake of food. (v. 19-20). In the end, it is better to abstain from eating food or do other acts than to cause others to fall. (v. 21) Luther rightly points out that Christian freedom should be used to help, not harm the week. When the latter is done, it leads to dissension and despising of the Gospel. Perhaps this is because such acts are selfishly motivated, while using Christian freedom to help others is outwardly motivated. Whatever the Christian believes regarding such a matter should be a private matter between that person and God. It is true that the person who does not feel condemned by unnecessary scruples is blessed. However, if a person has scruples then he should not eat, because his act is not motivated by faith, and all that does not come from faith is sin. (v. 22-23).

--How should difficulties regarding scruples be resolved among Christians? Why does Paul say that all that does not come from faith is sin?

People who are strong in the faith and understand that the OT law has been abolished should bear with the failings of others and not please themselves. The goal should be to build up our neighboors. (v. 1-2). As Wesley and Calvin both explain, those who have greater discernment into the Lord are to exercise that discernment to help others. For even Christ did not please Himself with his life, similar to what is described in Psalm 69:9. (v. 3). Calvin explains that in the Psalm, the prophet states that his zeal for God is so great that when the ungodly insult God, hit hurts him. In a similar fashion, Christ took upon himself the work of God to the extent that He humbled himself to an amazing degree. The scriptures, such as the cite from Psalm 69:9 provides encouragement for Christians, so that we might have hope. (v. 4).

--What does it mean to be "strong" in the faith? How can those who are strong be identified? How is Christ's strength an example for us in helping others? How do the scriptures provide encouragement and hope?

Paul begins Rom 15: 5 with a prayer that God will give the church at Rome a spirit of unity, along with endurance and encouragement, as the church follows Christ. The purpose of this is for the church to glorify God. (v. 6). Christians are to accept on another, in the same way we have been accepted by Christ, in order to bring praise to God. (v. 7) Christ was sent to the Jews to testify to the truthfulness of God and the promises He made to the patriarchs, so that in the end the Gentiles would glorify God. (v. 8-9). Wesley points out that the name Jesus Christ refers both to the name Jesus--by which he is known to the Gentiles, and Christ--his office towards the Jewish people. When Jesus is refered to as Christ, then the author is emphasizing his being the Messiah. Likely it is done here to because Paul is emphasizing God's working through Christ throughout history which culminated in the Gospel being brought to the gentiles and the establishment of the church. Paul then quotes Old Testament scriptures showing that God desires the Gentiles to be in relationship with Him, and quotes the prophecy in Isaiah 11:10 that Christ would rise and that the Gentiles would put their hope in him. (v. 10-12). Paul's desire is that God will fill all with joy and peace as we trust in Him, so that we may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit. (15:13).

Time For New Space Vehicle

Given the fact that 2 Space Shuttles have blown up already, and that the billion dollars spent to "ensure the shuttle is safe" have not been able to even fix what appears to be the exact same problem that fatally wounded Columbia, it is time for the US to scrap the shuttle program and develop a new space vehicle. The shuttle's basic design is based on 1970's technology and given all the development in technology over the past 30 years, one would hope that a more effective, useful and safe orbiter could be developed. The development of a new orbiter would also be a boon to the aerospace industry, likely have military benefits and create thousands of jobs. Additionally, the development and creation of a new spacecraft with improved capabilities (perhaps by the creation of a vehicle that can perform the shuttle's current task of Earth orbit while also being adaptable for further travel) would create new interest in the space program and reinvigorate it, while also proving an inspiration for youngsters. Let's all pray that Discovery returns safely to Earth and then make this the last shuttle flight, focusing our efforts and monies on a new spacecraft for the 21st century.

Killearn DTS Romans 14: 9-13

DTS friends, I apologize for not posting this before heading up to KY. I typed it out and must have accidentally hit the save button, and not the button to post it. Here it is now, doing only half the job that L.G. did last week.

In verses 7 and 8, Paul states that no Christian lives unto himself or dies unto himself. We life for the Lord and at His pleasure, and when we die, we belong to the Lord. Because each person belongs to the Lord, Paul teaches earlier in chapter 14 that Christians should not judge or look down on other Christians if they have different beliefs on non-essential matters of the faith. In verse 9, Paul states that "for this end" Christ died and rose and lived again for the purpose that he might be the Lord of both the living and the dead. As Calvin puts it, Christ earned authority over us by paying the great price of death on a cross, and by showing his authority over death via His resurrection. Given the fact that we all belong to Christ, we should not judge or show contempt for our Christian brothers, for all stand before Christ's judgment seat as stated in Isaiah 45:23. (v. 10-11). Calvin states our judging our fellow Christians makes about as much sense as a criminal attempting to ascend to climb into the judge's chair and exercise his authority. In the end, each one of us gives an account of himself to God. (v. 12). For that reason, we should not judge one another but instead resolve the differences we have so that we do not create stumbling blocks to the faith of others. (v. 13).

Killearn DTS Romans 13: 8 Through 14: 8

Chapter 13 begins with Paul explaining that the Christian must submit himself to the governmental authorities and not believe that he is above the law. Generally, the government is established to maintain order in society and punish wrongdoers, and to the extent a government is properly exercising these functions (punishing evildoers and "commending" Christians and other in society for right actions) the Christian should not run afoul of it. After explaining to the church in Rome how to get along with the secular authorities, Paul gives advice on how to live among one another. The rest of Ch. 13 is perhaps best read as a continuation of the practical advice Paul gives in Ch. 12. In v. 8, Paul says that no debts among believers should be left outstanding, except the ongoing debt we have to love one another. It is in the continual payment of that debt that a person fulfills the Old Testament law, or at least as Calvin puts it, the aspects of the law contained in the 2nd half of the Ten Commandments and summarized by Jesus as "Love your neighbor as yourself." All the various commands of the law telling us not to commit adultery, murder, steal, covet, and the rest are summed up by the command of Leviticus 19:18, which Jesus quoted when telling us to love our neighbor. (v. 9). Wesley notes that Paul is saying that if we love those around us and seek their good, we will obey the various commandments of God. As Paul tells us in verse 10, love does no harm to its neighbor, therefore it is the fulfillment of the law.

--Why is it important not to leave debts outstanding? What barriers can not making a debt good build between people and what principles does it violate? What are the key aspects of the love Paul is speaking of that enable it to automatically conform to the various rules of the Bible? Does the fact that love is the fulfillment of the law indicate that a purpose of the OT law was to help people love on another?

Paul tells his readers to do this in light of the fact that salvation has drawn closer than when the believers first believed. Two possible interpretations can be made here. Traditionally, Paul's reference to salvation drawing closer is a reference to the fact that as time goes on, each person moves closer toward the salvation that only comes after death. Wesley and Calvin read the passage in this way. Some modern interpreters think that Paul believed in the imminent second coming of Christ. If this is so, it does not harm the interpretation of these verses, since here he is using the possibility of an imminent second coming as a motivator towards obeying the teachings in this letter. The Revelation tells us to always eagerly anticipate Christ's return to earth (Rev 22: 17-21) and thus Paul's attitude falls in line with the eager anticipation of Christ's return. In the end, the important point is to realize that life is fleeting, our salvation may be imminent, and thus we should act as living sacrifices for the God we follow. Paul states in verse 12 that since the night is almost over and the day almost here, we should put aside deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light. Our life on earth is compared with the night, while the resurrection is the dawn of a new day. Wesley is worth quoting at length here. "[W]e are to awake out of sleep; to rise up and throw away our night clothes, fit only for darkness, and put on new; and being soldiers, we are to arm, and prepare for fight, for we are encompassed by so many enemies. The day dawns when we receive faith...[t]hen it is time to rise, to arm, to walk, to work, lest sleep steal upon us again. Final salvation, glory, is nearer to us now than when we first believed. It is continually advancing, flying forward upon the swiftest wings of time. And that which remains between the present hour and eternity is comparatively but a moment." Paul continues by telling the reader in v. 13 to behave decently, as a person would in the daytime. Thus, there should not be sexual immorality, drunkenness, debauchery, dissension, and jealousy. (v. 13). Instead, we are to clothe ourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ and not think about how to gratify the sinful nature. (v. 14).

--Does the teaching Paul gives in these verses remind of you of other teaching he made in other letters? If so, which ones?

After telling the Christian that he must offer himself as a living sacrifice to God and love his neighbor as himself, Paul begins a lengthy teaching on the importance of accepting those in the community of faith whose faith is weak. Christians must accept those around them whose faith is weaker than their own, and do so without passing judgment on that person with regard to disputable matters. (v. 1) It is important to understand from the context that will follow, Paul considers "weak faith" to be of the type that has unnecessary scruples regarding spiritual practices such as eating certain foods, holding certian holidays. It may seem counterintuitive to consider such things as a hallmark of a weak faith, but remember that Paul has spent much of the letter explaining why faith in Christ is sufficient for salvation, and that outward works and conformity to the Old Testament law accomplishes nothing. Paul is trying to get his readers to simplify their relationship with God. Believe in Jesus Christ, love God, love those around you. Everything else in the spiritual life will fall into place if these things are done. Therefore, if a person seemed to think that eating certain foods would make God angry (as in the Jewish religious code) then this is a sign that person has yet to attain the full faith necessary to put aside this old way of thinking and instead rely fully on Jesus Christ for salvation through faith. Returning to the text, Paul explains that one man may have faith that allows him to eat anything, while another man eats on vegetables for religious reasons. (v. 2). Neither man should look down on the other, for God has accepted each. (v. 3). We should not judge one other, for each Christian is the servant of God and thus serves Him. To his own master he will either stand or fall, and if that person is truly a Christian, he will stand for the Lord is able to make him stand. (v. 4).

--What are disputable matters in the church? What are indisputable matters? We are told not to judge others. What exactly does it mean to judge another person? Does that mean we cannot correct others? Why do you think that most everyone rebels strongly against the judgment of others? What picture of the sustaining grace of God do we get from verse 4?

Paul shows that he is assuming that the person who is "strong" or "weak" in the faith acts out of good motives. He is not defending the person who is rebelling against God and acting badly and yet wants those around him to accept his behavior because we are not allowed to judge. Rather, Paul states that the person who has scruples and the person that does not with regard to holy days or other issues should be fully convinced intellectually of the truthfulness of his belief (v. 5), and as Calvin states, be also convinced that his viewpoint is pleasing to God. The person who has scruples, and the person without them, should perform such acts unto the Lord as acts of worship and give thanks. (v. 6). Calvin makes a good point when he notes that Paul is telling the Christian to consider his acts before the tribunal of God, and thus if a person truly does so, it will restrain that person from acting sinfully or making mistakes of judgment. We must do our acts unto the Lord for no person lives only for himself alone, or even dies for himself alone. (v. 7). As C.S. Lewis put it, either God or the Devil will say "mine" to each thing in creation in the end. God is in the end sovreign over His creation. If we live, we live in submission to the Lord. And if we die, we die in submission to the Lord's wishes. For the same God created man and placed upon each man the curse of death. As such, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. (v. 8).

--If there are things you refrain from doing out of a belief that God does not want you to engage in that action, what are your reasons for this decision? Is there any potential value in having a church community where different people have different beliefs regarding non-essential matters? How should the fact that God is our sovreign (whether we live or die, we belong to him) affect the way we act?

Killearn DTS Romans 13: 1-7

The obedience that is due governmental authorities from a Christian is Paul's subject in Romans 13: 1-7. As Wesley points out, since the epistle is directed to the church at Rome--the seat of power--the question is especially pertinent to this church. Additionally, the Jewish people were chafing under Rome's rule, a situation that would eventually result in a Jewish rebellion that eventually was crushed and destroyed the Jerusalem temple in 70 A.D. The instructions are also important to all believers in the church as the Romans often suspected the Christians of being treasonous since they would not swear fealty to the Roman gods, but only to Christ alone. As such, Wesley states that the letter also serves as a public defense of the Christian religion that attempts to show that Christians are not formenting rebellion against the empire.

Paul begins (v. 1) by saying that all persons must be obedient to the higher powers. Two powers are mentioned. First, there is the supreme power of God. Second, God in his supreme power establishes the governmental authorities. Those that resist the governmental authorities therefore resisit the ordinance of God and are subject to punishment from God. With regard to the governmental authorities, Wesley states that the governmental authorities are subordinate to and their authority thus is worthy of Christian obedience. Calvin notes that all persons must be obedient to the authorities, and that all leaders have been placed in their position by God's hand. With regard to tyrannies and unjust ruleers, Calvin states such governments are disordered and thus not ordained by God.

--What does it mean that God establishes the governmental authorities? Does He establish all governmental authorities directly as part of His plan, or are some tyrannies allowed to exist but not actually established by God? Calvin states that tyrannies are not ordained by God. Do you agree? Explain your thoughts on the matter.

Paul continues by giving practical advice regarding the government, its useful, and the proper Christian response. Governments do not act against good works, but rather evil ones. Thus, the Christian who does good should not fear the government, which will look kindly upon those who are doing good within society. (v. 3). As such, the magistrate is a minister of God sent for our benefit if we do good, but a minister of wrath to us if we do evil who bears the sword not in vain. (v. 4). According to Calvin, governments are established for the public order and good, to provide safety to good people and restrain wickedness. Opposing this function is tantamount to opposing the good of humanity. Calvin also says that even a wicked magistrate should be obeyed, however, since such a person is sent as a punishment from God for our sins. Wesley says that Paul's instructions are generally true, but that some governments are exceptions to the teaching in verse 3. Both Wesley and Calvin state that verse 4 refers to capital punishment, which each believes God authorizes to be inflicted.

--If a government acts against good works and supports evil, would the Christian be freed from obeying it? Paul says the purpose of governmental authorities is to restrain evil and allow good to flourish. What other purposes, if any, are there? Do you agree with Calvin that wicked rulers are sent as a punishment from God? Does v. 4 authorize capital punishment?

The governmental authorities should be obeyed not only for practical reasons such as avoiding punishment, but also for conscience sake. (v. 5) The Christian is also to pay taxes for the public good. (v. 6). In the end, we should render the proper respect and actions to the governmental authorities by paying taxes and customs, and obeying and honoring those who have power. (v. 7). As Wesley states, obedience to God is important here. Calvin notes here in his commentary that the discourse Paul is giving applies only to legitigimate authorities and is inapplicable to tyrannies that try to rule over the consciences of men. Interestingly, Luther says that we are to be subject to the secular authorities for practical reasons, and that doing so does not make us virtuous in God's sight. Calvin states that obedience is an acceptable service to God.

--It appears that a Christian is required to pay taxes for the public good. Does this mean the IRS is God's holy instrument? What does this indicate about the authority of government to lvy taxes? Who do you agree with regard to the spiritual benefit of obedience to authority--Luther or Calvin? In the end, does this passage teach that Christians must be obedient to the governmental authorities regardless of their actions? Explain your answer. If you do not think so, state what acts of a government would cause it to forfeit its right to our obedience?

DTS for Sunday June 26th Cancelled

See you again in July with Romans 13

Air Force Academy Flies Past Religious Intolerance Charge

It is good to hear that that the US Air Force Academy was not found to be a hotbed of evangelical Christian intolerance by an investigating panel. One of the more egregious acts of a campus chaplain was to tell new cadets to be born again or risk the fires of Hell. While that may be a bit extreme and probably should be moderated, one would hope that our future military leaders can handle the occassional heavy handed tactic by clergy. Other "charges" by the report border on the ludicrous. Apparently some have complained that chaplains have had the gall to pressure cadets to "attend religious services and receive theological training." Shocking! A chaplain telling folks to go to church and learn about their religion. Wow, clearly these chaplains need to understand that all roads lead to God, not make any recommendations regarding the spiritual life since feeling that God loves you is what is important, and become well-mannered ministers of secularism. Of course, the chaplains and cadets at the academy should respect the various religious and non-religious viewpoints of others. At the same time, however, if the Air Force wants to have religious chaplains it needs to be willing to let those folks express their religious creeds to those around them, for as too many secularists forget, tolerance is a two-way street.

Klansman Reminder of Southern Church's Heritage

The manslaughter conviction of Edgar Ray Killen for the 1964 killings of three civil rights workers in Mississippi hopefully brings a measure of justice for the deaths of three young men (1 black and 2 white) who were murdered by a group of Klansmen for aiding the cause of ending segregation. In addition to his Klan membership, Killen was also an ordained Baptist minister. As most everyone is aware, many churches in the south during the civil rights era actively opposed the battle to end segregation. In a sad indictment of the Christian church of the time, Martin Luther King, Jr. had anticipated that white clergymen would see the rightness of the cause of black equality both under the law and in human hearts and that southern white churches would support his movement. However, many churches instead actively opposed the movement and never came en masse to effect change, leaving King disappointed and disillusioned. While few white churches in the south are actively racist today, the sins committed by Christians during the civil rights period continue to have long standing effects on the church today. Most churches remain racially segregated today, limiting the effectiveness the church has in enacting the social components of the gospel. And much of society looks at the moral stands that many theologically traditional southern churches take today against abortion, sexual immorality, and other issues and simply think that it is the same hateful, intolerant attitude of the 60's expressed in different ways. Granted, there are reasonable answers to this charge that I think are sufficient to rebut it, but the lesson to learn is that the wages of sin often are not only death, but last for generations thereafter.

Killearn DTS Romans 12: 9-21

After commenting on the use of spiritual gifts within the church, Paul provides rules of conduct or Christian living that are to be followed by believers. First, he writes that love must be sincere. Calvin notes that often many people put on a false face when dealing with others and that this must be put aside. Additionally, we are told to cling to those things that are good, and hate evil. (v. 9). Christians are to love one another with brotherly love, and honor one another above ourselves. (v. 10). Wesley gives the practical advice that we should consider what is good in others in evil in ourselves, which will lead us to do this. The Christian should not lack in zeal, but instead maintain his or her spiritual fervor (v. 11). Wesley and Calvin both apply this verse to our work in business. Paul then gives an exortation to be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, and faithful in prayer. Wesley and Calvin both say that the hope of eternal life is important in doing these things, and Wesley adds the hope of holiness. (v. 12) Christians should help fellow believers in need and practice hospitality. (v. 13). As Calvin notes, when we help those in need, we cannot expect a personal gain and thus such service helps to show the legitimacy of our love.

--Why is Paul concerned that Christians act in sincere love with one another? What is the brotherly love that Paul exorts us to? Is it difficult to maintain spiritual fervor, and how should we maintain it? What is the importance of hospitality?

Paul provides rules for living in harmony, some of which are difficult. He tells us to bless those who persecute us and not to curse. This, Calvin notes, is arduous and wholly opposed to the nature of man. (v. 14). We are also to rejoice with those who are rejoicing, and mourn with those in mourning. (v. 15). We are to live in harmony with one another and associate with people of low positions, not being conceited. (v. 16). The Christian is not to repay retaliate for evil with an evil act. Additionally, we are to attempt to do the right thing in the eyes of everyone. (v. 17). To the extent it is possible, Christians are to live in peace with those around us. (v. 18). Revenge should not be taken by the Christian, but instead the matter should be left to God, and we should treat our enemies kindly for it will often have the effect of showing him his bad behavior and tormenting him. (v. 19-20). To summarize, we are not to be overcome by evil, but rather overcome evil with good. (v. 21).

--How is it that we are to bless those that persecute us? Why is it important that we rejoice and mourn in community, and what does doing such things indicate about ourselves? Do our churches today associate with people of low position? What benefits do such association provide to individuals and communities? Why is it important to do the right thing in the eyes of everyone? What is "the extent possible" that Paul limits the requirement that Christians live in peace with those around them? Why should revenge be saved for God? Is Paul right that right kind actions against our enemies can torment them? When we retaliate in evil, how is it that we are thus overcome by evil? How is it that evil is overcome by good?

Wierd Scientology

With all the hulabaloo surrounding Tom Cruise's acting like a cheshire cat on methamphetamines while publicising his relationship with Katie Holmes, the religion/cult/scam of scientology has been in the news quite a bit. HERE is a link to a well known 1990 Time magazine cover story on the group. A good photo of the cover art can be found here. The Scientologists apparently sued over this one, but the US Supreme Court denied their petition. I don't think I'll be joining anytime soon. I don't have the money.